Penelope's-Wods must have run out of ideas

Well, for this review, the critic has reviewed penelopes. Let's think about this. Most of his audience lives in murray hill,or at least the eastern part of midtown. Penelope's is a murray hill mainstay. WHY REVIEW A PLACE THAT 80% OF YOUR AUDIENCE HAS BEEN TO MANY TIMES!! I polled wods audience and 4 out of 5 of them have been to penelope's more than once. I tried to find more readers of wod's blog,but sadly failed to find 6 people who admitted to reading it. So my question is this. Why is is that all of wods reviews are places everyone has been (penelope's, rare, ThaiNy) or random "diamonds in the rough" that he always claims are incredible. I mean, at this point his whole strategy has been exposed more than Jason Garret's offense! I've never read a blog more predictable than Mission Impossible 3 yet more confusing than Scream 3 at the same time. This is just terrible,terrible work. Worse yet,the critic's descriptions can best be described as "straight out of a homosexual thesaurus" (someone else's words, not mine) For the second time in as many months, I will refuse to review a wodstein blog. As the critic alway says,when reviewing, you must discuss the good and the bad. Accordingly, this is an awful review,and I must advise you NOT waste one second reading Wodstein's Penelope's review.

on a happier note, Happy New Years to all.